Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have the right to do and what is right to do.”

 This quote is often attributed to Potter Stewart,

Ethics is a branch of philosophy concerned with determining what is morally right or wrong. It involves principles and guidelines that help individuals make decisions and evaluate the consequences of their actions. The quote suggests that ethics involves understanding the distinction between what is legally permissible or within one's rights and what is morally or ethically correct.

Having the right to do something implies that it is legally allowed or permissible within a certain framework or set of rules. However, just because something is legally permitted doesn't necessarily mean it is morally right. Ethics goes beyond legality and encourages individuals to consider the broader impact of their actions and whether they align with ethical principles such as honesty, fairness, compassion, and respect for others.

 this quote emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between the rights we possess and the moral obligations we should uphold. It suggests that ethics requires us to consider not only what we are allowed to do but also what is morally right to do, taking into account the potential consequences and impact on others.

Certainly! When it comes to public service, the quote by Potter Stewart can be applied in various scenarios. Here are a few examples to illustrate the difference between what one has the right to do and what is right to do in the context of public service ethics:

1. Confidentiality and Transparency:

Public servants often deal with sensitive information and have access to confidential data. While they may have the legal right to access and handle such information, ethics requires them to balance confidentiality with the principles of transparency and accountability. For instance, a public servant might have the right to access confidential documents related to a government project, but it may be ethically right to disclose relevant information to the public if it serves the greater public interest.

2. Conflict of Interest:

Public servants have a responsibility to act in the best interests of the public they serve. This obligation may conflict with personal interests or relationships they have outside of their official roles. For example, a government official who has the legal right to participate in the decision-making process for awarding contracts might have a personal relationship with one of the bidders. While they have the right to participate, it would be ethically right for them to recuse themselves from the process to avoid any appearance of favoritism or bias.

3. Use of Public Resources:

Public servants have access to public resources, such as budgets, equipment, and facilities. They may have the right to use these resources for their personal purposes, but ethics dictates that they use them responsibly and in the best interest of the public. For instance, a government official may have the right to use a government vehicle for personal errands, but it would be ethically right to use it solely for official purposes to avoid misuse of public resources.

4. Decision-Making and Fairness:

Public servants often make decisions that affect the lives of citizens, such as approving permits, allocating funds, or enforcing regulations. While they have the legal authority to make these decisions, ethics requires them to be fair, impartial, and considerate of the public's welfare. For instance, a zoning board member may have the right to approve a construction project that meets all legal requirements, but it would be ethically right to consider potential environmental impacts and community concerns before making a decision.

These examples highlight the distinction between what public servants have the right to do within their roles and what is ethically right to do in the context of serving the public interest. Ethical considerations go beyond legal obligations and require public servants to carefully evaluate their actions based on principles such as transparency, accountability, fairness, and the greater good.

Or 

The statement "Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have the right to do and what is right to do" touches upon an important aspect of ethical decision-making. Ethics refers to the moral principles and values that guide human behavior and help us determine what is right or wrong. It involves considering the consequences of our actions and making choices that align with moral standards and social norms.

The statement implies that having the right to do something does not necessarily mean it is ethically or morally justified. In other words, legality does not equate to morality. Just because we have the legal permission or rights to engage in certain actions does not automatically make them ethically right or socially acceptable.

Ethics requires us to go beyond the boundaries of legality and consider broader principles, such as fairness, justice, and the well-being of others. It urges us to consider the impact of our actions on individuals, society, and the environment.

For example, let's consider a scenario where a company has the legal right to dump its waste products into a nearby river. From a legal perspective, they may have obtained the necessary permits or licenses to do so. However, from an ethical standpoint, this action may be deemed harmful to the environment, local communities, and the well-being of future generations. Even though they have the right to dump waste, it may not be considered the right thing to do from an ethical standpoint.

Ethical decision-making involves critical thinking, empathy, and a consideration of various perspectives. It requires us to reflect on the potential consequences of our actions and consider the moral implications. Sometimes, ethical choices may go against personal interests, legal permissions, or societal norms, but they are made in the pursuit of what is morally right and just.

In summary, the statement highlights that ethics involves recognizing the distinction between what we have the right to do and what is morally right to do. It reminds us that legal permissions do not automatically make actions ethical, and we should consider the broader consequences and moral implications of our choices. Ethics encourages us to align our actions with fundamental principles such as fairness, justice, and the well-being of others.